Glossary

Working time fraud

Working time fraud means deliberately stating working time falsely, for instance by clocking in for absent colleagues or entering hours not worked. It is a serious breach of the duties under the employment contract.

As of:September 2026

What follows in employment law

The Federal Labour Court regards deliberate abuse of a time recording system as capable of justifying summary dismissal under section 626 BGB, even without a prior warning, because the basis of trust is destroyed (judgment of 09/06/2011, 2 AZR 381/10).

A weighing of the individual case is still required: length of service, previous conduct, extent of the breach, repetition. Forgetting to clock out once is not fraud but a mistake.

The two-week period in section 626(2) BGB starts as soon as the person entitled to dismiss knows the relevant facts. Anyone investigating at length and then dismissing risks the period having expired.

Who has to prove what

In unfair dismissal proceedings the employer has to prove the breach. A record that can be changed after the fact is weak material for that; a system with logged corrections is strong.

Evidence is itself subject to limits: covert monitoring is permissible only under narrow conditions. The Federal Labour Court has, however, held that a prohibition on using evidence does not follow automatically from a data protection breach (judgment of 29/06/2023, 2 AZR 296/22).

MetronHR works these figures out itself: time accounts, premiums, overtime and the limits of the German Working Hours Act, with every booking.

What businesses can do to prevent it

Clear rules on what counts as working time: set-up time, smoking breaks, private errands. Where that is not settled, disputes arise over conduct that nobody meant as fraud.

A procedure for corrections that is logged. Anyone who can add forgotten bookings without concealing it has no reason to manipulate the records.

And an evaluation that makes anomalies visible without permanently monitoring individuals. That difference decides whether it is permissible.

Common mistake

The summary dismissal gets issued without the two-week period in section 626(2) BGB in view. It starts when the relevant facts are known, not when the internal investigation is complete.

Further reading

Section 626 BGB
Federal Labour Court, judgment of 09/06/2011, 2 AZR 381/10
Federal Labour Court, judgment of 29/06/2023, 2 AZR 296/22

This is not legal advice; for a specific case at your workplace you are better off asking someone qualified to give it.

wissen.ugur_aydogan_produktentwicklung_bei

Published by: AMNAU GmbH

Editorial responsibility: Ugur Aydogan, Product development.

Last reviewed: September 2026

Knowing the terms is one thing. Settling them cleanly is another.

MetronHR keeps time accounts, calculates premiums and checks the limits of the German Working Hours Act automatically. Try it free for 14 days.

No credit card, cancel any time